My Photo

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 02/2004

« August 2005 | Main | October 2005 »

Rick Warren, Part One: Purpose Driven Nation Building

The current CT has an article about Rick Warren's quixotic attempt to build a purpose driven nation in Rwanda. The article is strangely similar to one that ran recently in The New Yorker. I'm wondering if Warren is using talking points, a publicist, or press releases. Some of the verbiage was identical, and that seems a bit odd to me. I mean The New Yorker and Christianity Today? Really.

Anyway, I plan on doing a full, serious series on this, but I'll start with just a tidbit. While addressing a gathering of Rwandan pastors about the genocide in '94, Warren quipped: "If the Devil gives you problems about your past, you remind him of his future." So, plan A for Rick is to take a bumper sticker collection to Rwanda? I hope CT was embarrassed to have to print that. I hope the people of Saddleback are embarrassed by that statement. I sincerely hope Rick is embarrassed. More than that, I hope he takes the time to study the political dynamics that led to the genocide and recognizes to what degree those feelings are still present in Rwanda.

I believe Kagame is a good man. I believe his benevolent dictatorship is just that. A nation eleven years removed from a horrible genocide is not ready for a democracy, and believe me, it's only a matter of time before American evangelicals associated with this program start bitching about democracy in Rwanda. For those of you who would argue the U.S. did just that after slaughtering Native Americans, I'd remind you that the democracy did not apply to African Americans, women, and other minority groups.

I think Rick Warren has had a genuine epiphany where social justice is concerned, but I'm a little concerned about his attempts to apply his Southern California sociological experiment to nation building in Africa. All they need is another colonial movement; the first one was such a success.

Welcome to the Heartland, or In Praise of Elitism

The hot, disappointed hairdresser wife told me I could not be an elitist and a Christian; I'm writing this anyway.

We went to lunch at Trapper's today. For those of you not from around here, it's a Cajun-themed restaurant with pretty good food that sits right where north and south OKC come together, adjacent to I-40. Trapper's is always full of men at lunch. The area around it is somewhat industrial, so women in those sorts of businesses are in short supply. That means tons of embroidered logos on golf shirts, leather belts with metal accents, Wrangler jeans, mustaches, thick Oklahoma accents, and a whole bunch of poor shoe choices.

We are seated in the second booth in a row of four along the back wall. The first booth is occupied by two men in embroidered golf shirts and khakis. The hottie has her back to them; I am facing a largish fellow in a red, golf shirt with Mohawk embroidered on it. That probably means he works for Mohawk Carpet company. Probably a sales rep. Sales reps always wear khakis. He's holding forth on Scripture when we sit down.

"That's why Paul wrote those letters, 'cause the church was having problems even back then. So the Catholic Church controls the Bible, won't let anyone read it 'cause the priests don't want people knowin' what it really says. Some folks read it anyway and they learned. They protested against what was being done by the Catholic Church, you know, Protestants."

Elitist point number one: Religion should be treated the same as other professional endeavors, with one exception (which I'll come to in a moment). I do not sit down with friends and hold forth about cardiology or psychiatry or horticulture. I have spent exactly zero time studying them. The fact that I've been in hospitals, nurseries, doctors offices, and greenhouses, or have had friends that pursued those professions does not make me an expert on any of them. Therefore, my opinion regarding them should be disregarded. The same is true of biblical studies, church history, and ecclesiology. The fact that someone has sat in church for one year or fifty years in no way qualifies them to know anything about religion, or Christianity and the Bible in particular. If you haven't studied, I feel free to disregard your opinion. Unfortunately, religion seems to be the only field of interest, except sports, where amateurs feel free to pontificate and then get offended if you disagree or argue, as if it's all a matter of opinion. The exception: there are some people who through a life of service, commitment, Bible reading, prayer, church attendance, and listening actually become something like a saint. They should be heeded even if they've never seen the inside of a college.

Mohawk man continued to talk about nearly everything you would expect a middle class, white, sales rep, church-going, somewhat redneck-ish Oklahoman to talk about. Here is a smattering.

Speaking of Arab Americans: "We should do what we did to Japanese people during WWII, you know, put 'em in those camps. Wouldn't be any sleeper cells that way." Nor would there be civil rights in America for non-white folk, but I think Mohawk guy is okay with that. Because...

Speaking of African Americans: "Those folks down in New Orleans are just used to hand outs. Hell, take any rich man, if he gives his kid everything, that kid won't appreciate it. Black people used to be oppressed but they had morals back then, you know, families were together, moms and dads. Now look what's happened." By which he appears to be arguing that Jim Crow was a good thing because it built character? Or that white people aren't in any way responsible for the plight of African Americans? And now to border policy...

"They can just sneak across the border into Texas. That's what them Muslims are doing. People in south Texas are always finding Muslim prayer rugs on their property." I did not make that up. The hottie heard it too. I probably don't even need to editorialize on something that blatantly stupid. I may be wrong, but I'm thinking you're more likely to find a chupacabra in a south Texas prairie than a prayer rug.

These were some of the more egregious examples of what people in the Heartland think. Some of his stuff was benign, some stupid, some ignorant, and some funny. All of it was pathetic. I know; I'm an elitist. So...

Elitist point number two: If you are caught using talking points from the right or the left, you should be prohibited from voting in the next election. If you are caught using phrases or ideas from talk radio, you should lose your voting privileges for not less than five years. If the radio host ceases broadcasting within that five years, you may have your privileges reinstated at the end of that calendar year so long as you promise never to mention him or his ideas again.

Elitist point three: Multiculturalism is here. Deal with it. I'm tired of feeling like a bad guy because I think people like Mohawk man are raving lunatics. He is a lunatic. Anyone who wants to put an entire race in internment camps is a lunatic. Anyone who reads the Bible and goes to church and still is a functional racist is a lunatic. That may be elitist, but I can live with that.

Here was my hands-down favorite moment from the conversation: "And all those idologies...idolagies...what's the word? (Friend helps.) Yeah, ideologies, you know socialism, um...that sort of stuff..." Trailed off there. He could only think of one ideology and then couldn't remember what he didn't like about them, or perhaps in a timely epiphany, he realized he was espousing about a half dozen.

This guy probably makes decent money. He probably drives a fairly new automobile. He probably goes to a Southern Baptist church (and I say that because one in four Christians in OK do). He probably lives in a non-descript suburban home in Moore or Mustang or Yukon. He probably has a wife and a couple kids. He appears to be completely normal from all outward appearances. His clients probably think he's efficient if somewhat too talkative. His Sunday School class probably shares many of his values if not his outspokenness, and many of them have learned to couch their prejudices in spiritual language so those ideas don't sound like racism or xenophobia or the worship of capitalist ideals. They probably think of him as much like them. His pastor probably knows him as a guy that can fix things or who shows up for men's ministry all the time. His neighbors see his OU flag on game day, and they see him taking his kids to ball practice, and they wave at him when he mows the lawn. He's a normal, functional, average, Christian, heartland American. I find that very troubling.

Discount Dildos

Wal-Mart Canada has announced that it will be carrying "sexual well-being products." Uhm, dear frostback neighbors to the north, we call 'em vibrators and dildos around here. The hot, adult-toy surfing hairdresser wife came (hee hee) across this comment from a Wal-Mart spokesperv tonight:

But Wal-Mart Canada spokesman Kevin Groh said the product line is a good fit, as the company caters to the Canadian mainstream and, as such, carries products that reflect mainstream tastes.

Good fit! Get it?! Ha! Note to our local okie Wal-Mart shoppers: it ain't happenin' here so long as Anthony Jordan has a breath in his body. And, yes, I'm aware of what the title of this entry will do to the search engine rankings.

Bob Accepts the Challenge

Bob is doing some reflecting on megachurch-dom over at his blog, and I've promised to post some comments over there soon. Unfortunately I have to be up early in the a.m. to substitute teach, so I'll have to do it later. Drop by and join the conversation.

Brannon Howse: Asshat of the Week

Brannon Howse from Worldview Weekend sent out an email to plug his appearance on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. As if that's not bad enough, he included a rant against "America's Poverty Pimps." Who are these poverty pimps? No, it's not corporate America or mulitnationals, nor is it the politicians on the Right and Left who cooperate with them, and neither is it an indifferent, affluent "other" America. Here's what Brannon has to say:

Hurricane Katrina has brought to the nation’s attention the plight of the poor in America. While Jesse Jackson and other liberals attempt to blame poverty on racism and the President and other republicans look to throw money at the problem, few are discussing who and what are really to blame for the root cause of poverty in America.

The issue is not racism but anti-Christian bigotry on the part of the ACLU, the NEA, the DNC and Barry Lynn and his group, Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. The sad stories of the poor should be laid at the feet of the liberal, anti-God “intellectual elite” known as the secular left.

Decades-long brainwashing by liberal-leaning social engineers has so altered the worldview of the underclass that they have little choice but to live in the mire of their culturally bankrupt caste.

Anti-Christian bigotry causes poverty! Separation of Church and State causes poverty! Liberal-leaning social engineers cause poverty! Brilliant! The man should have the Adam Smith Chair of Economics at some prestigious university...say...Liberty University or Bob Jones. Thank you Brannon Howse for being the first ever Parish Asshat of the Week.

Just Faith

More of a question really. Check out Just Faith first. Then let me know if there are any Protestant equivalents. Not that I'm opposed to the Catholic version, but some of the folks I work with might be. This program has had an amazing impact in OKC. One parish has accomplished great things for the poor as a result of Just Faith. I crap on so many things around here, I figured I'd say something nice for a change.

Counseling from Bob, Again

Bob didn't like my tone recently: "Come on Greg, get back from the edge."

It's in response to my calling the themed orgies, I mean worship services, at Saddleback entertainment geared toward crackers. I'll grant that I often resort to hyperbole, but Bob says the kind of language I use in response to Saddleback "has no place in the kingdom." Wow. Seems someone needs to pay closer attention to his Bible. Hyperbole is all through Scripture. I was also accused of "blanket condemnation." I don't think I condemned anyone by saying Saddleback's themed carnivals, I mean worship services, were based not on theological conviction but on a desire to entertain crackers. If calling someone a cracker is condemnation, it's news to me. I consider myself one. Painfully white. Living in the suburbs. Out of touch with urban blight. Attending an almost exclusively white church. White friends. Little to no diversity in my life. Cracker.

The real story to me is that no one in legitimate Christian publishing is willing to criticize Saddleback or Willow Creek or any other megachurch that is "doing well." Sure, there are the occasional screeds from fundamentalists who lament the liberal ethos of the churches, but no one outside of fundyville takes them seriously. Then you have academic treatments like Kenneson and Street's Selling Out the Church, but again, outside academic circles, who reads that? Just once, in a magazine like CT or the one Bob works for, I'd like to see two or three or four sides of the story concerning the ecclesiology of megachurches. I'd like to see honest criticism from a theological perspective. I'd like to see Warren answer for his Southern Baptist roots in a way that doesn't dismiss questions. I'd like to see Hybels challenged for his thirty-year embrace of homogeneous church growth and not be allowed to kiss it off with an "oops" like he did in CT earlier this year. I'd like to see genuine engagement with ideas that don't bow before the collective wisdom of the Hybels/Warren pastor factory. And for the love of all that's holy, can someone please answer for the damn luau service. Just once. Give me less evangelical ass-kissing and more honest assessment and maybe I'll sound less strident. Grace and peace.

And Yet Another Shameless Self-Promotion

Light blogging this weekend. I'm preaching the kaleo service on Sunday, so I'll be studying, etc. If you're in the area Sunday night, drop in. The text is from Jonah. You can find it in the lectionary if you're liturgically savvy. I intend to prove the absolute historicity of Jonah, the existence of fish large enough to swallow men, the "repentance" of Nineveh through the lens of the contemporary substitutionary atonement rubric—which allows them to continue being evil and saved at the same time—and thereby secure my future position as preacer extraordinaire for Worldview Weekend. They haven't been to Oklahoma City yet, but when they do show up, they'll know who to call.

Answering Dave's Good Question

Dave asked: "...are you saying that everyone should be together in one service, meeting, gathering, whatever? I may be reading this wrong but how does having 'the prayer service' and 'the rock and roll service' (Sept 12th entry) fit into this?"

Let me try to answer your question, as it is bugging me too. First aside, kaleo is not a rock and roll service. That was an unfortunate appellation provided by a senior couple who think in terms of rock versus church music.

The idea for kaleo came about because it was obvious that our church was not embracing any kind of emergent or even blended ideas in the main worship service on Sundays (despite our senior pastor being as theologically conversent with emergent as anyone I know, a position he discovered quite by accident). That, to me, is as wrong-headed as chasing every new trend that comes down the river. The college pastor--yes, we have one of those--wanted to do something different on Sunday nights, a time period usually reserved for the very old, very traditional, and the staff who had to be there. I believe the thinking was that since only about 1/25th of the congregation showed up on Sunday night, why not try something different and redeem that time slot.

Enter us. We'd been going there for a while enduring ridiculous amounts of traditional music and traditionally-arranged worship choruses for the sake of community and the best, most theologically sound preaching I've ever heard. Some of the folk knew we had some experience with emergent church and they asked us to get involved. We combined our ideas with other ideas that had been simmering in that church for some time. Young people especially were anxious to get involved, and kaleo offered opportunities for all kinds of people to get involved who had been unable to do so before.

Our hope is that kaleo will be appealing to all ages and to those who like traditional and contemporary worship. It isn't our intent to create two churches in one building. That may happen in the minds of some folk, but we've insisted on our entire leadership team, including the music people, being in the Sunday a.m. worship service as well. The theological vision articulated in the Sunday a.m. service is vital to the life of kaleo. The commitment to community despite our differences is non-negotiable.

Why are there still other offerings on Sunday night? I think the pastoral leadership of the larger church, and I'm only speculating, wasn't sure how well kaleo would go over, and they knew there were folk that wouldn't like it no matter how hard we tried to blend ancient and future. Rather than tell those folks to suck it, they offered them some worthwhile programs (three of the four are not worship services) on Sunday nights, including prayer, discussion forums, small groups, and once a month, a joint kaleo/big church worship service. My preference is that all of us would be together for worship, but that requires that both sides of the aisle understand, respect, and embrace cultural differences. I don't see that most of the time.

Second aside: the Saddleback services have nothing to do with theological convictions (except maybe "saving souls"); they are predicated on entertaining a bunch of crackers who don't seem to understand that worship isn't about entertainment. They are not worship services in the strict sense, but rather serve as parodies of worship services, since what is being worshipped is individual choice as to what form of entertainment I prefer. Dave Rattigan has some good thoughts on the Saddleback issue.

Weary, I'm Weary

Please, just kill me: http://www.saddlebackfamily.com/home/todaystory.asp?id=5700

I'll editorialize later. When I've stopped weeping and gnashing my teeth. And get the ashes out of my eyes and the sackcloth fibers out of my ass...