Barring a bizarre death scenario, I'll be here post-Rapture a week from Sunday. I'll either wake to the news of a massive, worldwide disappearance of annoying fundamentalists (how is that a bad thing?) and a few Chrisitians I actually like, or I'll wake to Harold Camping's explanation of why the Rapture did not occur on May 21, 2011, as he's predicted. Or, perhaps he won't. When the Second Coming failed to materialize for Jehovah Witnesses in 1914 and 1915, they began a series of explanations that finally ended when it didn't happen again in 1975. They didn't even bother to explain that one. The nature of the faithful is that they will believe whatever is necessary to maintain their belief, especially in the face of evidence to the contrary. For many faith groups, it's considered a "test" of their faith, especially among the LDS who go so far as to insist that reality is simply a trick of the devil—think maya, the Hindu "illusion," with a 19th century American twist.
Many of you already know I grew up Pentecostal. I had the great misfortune of entering my oversexed teen years in conjunction with some horrifying books on end times prophecy hitting bestseller lists: Late Great Planet Earth by Hal Lindsey and The Vision by David Wilkerson, he of The Cross and the Switchblade fame. (In Wilkerson's defense, he actually predicted nudity on television, although he didn't predict pay television. Lindsey got nothing right.) Nothing contributes to teen angst about burning in hell for poontang quite like the promise of Jesus' imminent return. I spent the years from 12-16, when I abruptly left the faith for about ten years, anguishing over the threat of enduring the Tribulation for the sake of one more shot at Melanie's vajayjay. Surely beheading at the hands of the forces of Antichrist was worth one more shot at a natural redhead?
Like most (all) Pentecostal kids, I survived the 70s unRaptured, and the 80s, 90s, and 00s. I no longer know what "Jesus is coming soon," actually means, unless we're talking Latina porn. I barely escaped the 80s, at least according to the now deceased Edgar C. Whisenant. His pamphlet, 88 reasons Why The Rapture Will Be in 1988: The Feast of Trumpets (Rosh Hash-Ana) September, 11-12-13, now strangely out of print, caused a shitstorm in Pentecostal/Charismatic churches. Seriously. People selling their houses, quitting jobs, fucking that secretary they'd always...never mind. (I suspect Jesus was just pissed about the long-ass subtitle and was like, "Suck it, Edgar.") Anyway, survive the past 46 years I have, and I no longer worry about the Rapture. My last ten or so years as a Christian, a period which ended in 2006 if you're doing the Biblical numerology thing (always important when Rapture watching), I no longer believed in the Rapture. It was a position that caused some consternation at Southwestern Christian University, a school I was invited to leave my junior year. Apparently, according to one professor, "If Horton will compromise on the truth of the Rapture, what won't he compromise on?" Exactly. Disbelieve the Rapture, have sex with children. Ah, fundamentalism. How I don't miss you. An otherwise intelligent man who went to Harvard reduced to trite stupidity by the doctrine of a Jesus party a half mile off the ground.
I stopped believing in the Rapture because it's silly, even by metaphysical standards. It is, quite frankly, heretical. It does illustrate, though, that heresy is most often defined by what the majority will or won't accept, not by a test of exegesis. When John Nelson Darby first introduced this idea in the 18th century, no one had ever heard of such a thing. Had it not been popularized in Scofield's shitty annotations/references, it would have died a quick death on the moors of England. Alas. It's based on one verse. One. Nothing new to fundamentalism, mind you. They're convinced marriage is about one man and one woman, in the presence of hundreds of permissions for polygamy. Paul is writing to the Thessalonians. He uses a Greek word. The English transliteration ended up being Rapture. Now, here's the fun part. Grab verses from all over the Bible about judgment or last things or war or blood or Russia (yes, these guys used to believe the end times had to involve Russia), add them to that one verse, construct any end-times scenario you wish, blend, enjoy.
If the Rapture happens next weekend, I'll give every reader $100 dollars. However, what you must realize is that if it does happen, I just have to avoid you for about 3.5 years, and then Antichrist will be revealed and the smiting begins. At that point, I'll join the forces of Antichrist, and if you demand your money, I'll have you beheaded, because according to the Revelation, Antichrist cuts people's heads off. Apparently, when Lucifer returns to earth, he's utterly fucking befuddled by bullets and bombs and technology.
Just wrote a research paper on Christian Zionism for my religion and politics in America class at OU. I was quite blown away to learn that almost all of the end times hysteria that had been shared with me by friends or god awful Left Behind books had it's origins, as you mentioned, with John Nelson Darby. And Darby's dispensational premillenialist interpretation ran contradictory to hundreds of years of end times interpretation, yet it seems to have become the most prolific belief in America, at least among Evangelical Protestants. In my research, scholars on the subject estimate there are approximately 25 million Americans who seriously believe in the Darby view of the Biblical apocalypse. What's scary about that is that means there is a significant voting bloc that votes pretty much for anyone who they believe will usher in the end times prerequisites as soon as possible. They believe Israel belongs solely to the Jews and that God will bless the nations that support Israel,, so they actively oppose any kind of peace agreement and are rabidly supportive of preemptive war on nations (such as Iran) that pose any kind of threat to Israel. The suffering of Palestinian Muslims and Christians means very little when you believe you're a tool of God helping to bring Jesus back to earth. Add in neoconservatives like the whole Bush administration, the alliance of the far-right Pro-Israel lobby (who fundamentally disagree with the Christian Zionist belief that they will be slaughtered by the thousands by forces of the Antichrist and will either convert or burn in hell in the end - but hey, you get support from wherever you can) and the result is the Iraq War and hundreds of thousands dead, little or no help from America in any kind of peace agreement between Israel and Palestine, and the majority of the Arab world considering the U.S. to be its greatest threat. Not only does apocalyptic fundamentalism produce shitty books and movies that sell by the millions, it undermines global security and fosters significant support for endless war.
Posted by: Jared | May 13, 2011 at 11:06 AM
Short-time lurker here. Growing fan.
It only makes sense for Lucifer to use swords. Using his modern portrayals for a basis, he's clearly got style, panache, a sense of tradition. Bullets and bombs are less skilled weapons (exception: sniper rifle). A sword takes ability, a certain class of character and conveys either that sense of history or "Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya", depending on your geek archetype.
Posted by: Victorgh | May 13, 2011 at 05:14 PM
Welcome Victor, and thanks for one of the best posts ever. Princess Bride references always worth extra points.
Posted by: Greg Horton | May 14, 2011 at 09:48 AM
Thanks for getting the rapture vs end of the world distinction right. Not that you wouldn't, but it seems to be sadly missing in most of the coverage of this cult. I kind of wish they were correct - it would mean I wouldn't have to do any more wireless network setups over the phone after this coming week.
Victor is right, btw, that a sword is not as clumsy or random as a
blasterfirearm.Posted by: Leighton | May 15, 2011 at 03:45 PM
Dude. You totally left out that the Beast and the Anti-Christ have genetically modified lion scorpion things that sting and paralyze you. Who needs guns when you have have lion scorpion things?
Posted by: matt mikalatos | May 16, 2011 at 12:16 AM
I did forget the flying scorpion monster helicopter things that emerge from the pit. Damnit. My apologies.
Posted by: Greg Horton | May 16, 2011 at 12:17 AM
I read but don’t comment much, but here goes. I think it’s the sheer self centered individualism of the rapture theology that gets to me. How the author’s of the lamentable Left Behind novels could dismiss the aftermath. But, hey “I’m saved, too bad about the poor schmucks aboard the plane I was piloting.” It seems to be a selfish and scary theology.
Posted by: Jackie | May 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM
How come I can't get any attention at all by predicting the day the world WON'T end. I've already successfully done it, and can continue to do it for a long time!
Posted by: OldMom | May 18, 2011 at 11:29 PM
It is my professional opinion as a network technician that our phone software was raptured today. Looks like Stephen Hawking is wrong - there is a heaven for broken computers. Guess it just sucks to be human...
Posted by: Leighton | May 21, 2011 at 03:37 PM